Garate Outrighted


The Nats made the move to open up a spot for Matt Capps, outrighting LHRP Victor Garate to Triple-A Syracuse. I’ve updated the Big Board with the moves.

  1. #1 by Nate - January 8th, 2010 at 16:56

    I’m hoping this decision was made by having English, Severino, Slaten and Garate engage in a full-contact game of musical chairs. Man there’s still a lot of dead weight on our 40-man roster.

  2. #2 by JayB - January 8th, 2010 at 17:09

    Luis Atilano, Marco Estrada are also dead weight on about the weakest 40 man roster in baseball….added to English, Severino, Slaten that is 5 pitchers who would be on no other MLB 40 man roster. Rizzo has done some good work but not near enough..at best he has done 50% of what must be this winter if they are going to get any of the Suites sold when the 3 year leases are up this year.

  3. #3 by JayB - January 8th, 2010 at 17:18

    Alberto Gonzalez, Roger Bernadina, Justin Maxwell and Wil Nieves all are very weak 40 man roster people as well. Doubt too many other MLB teams would be carrying them either. If I am right that means the Nats have about a 31 man roster of players who MLB prospects or existing talent. I still wonder who we did not make room for a second rule 5 pick…..logic says whoever it was they would be better than our 32-40 spots.

  4. #4 by Brian Oliver - January 8th, 2010 at 17:23

    JayB-There is no reason for the Nationals to open up a 40-man spot until they have to open up a 40-man spot. I agree there are still areas they can improve but until they make a move, I’m not going to sweat who is/is not on the 40-man.

    As for the R5 draft … it appears there really wasn’t anyone worthy of being on the 25-man all year.

    They do need to continue to improve the 40-man but I don’t see it being a quick fix … as annoying as that is going to be

  5. #5 by SpringfieldFan - January 8th, 2010 at 17:45

    I will not argue with JayB about backup catchers. I will not argue with JayB about backup catchers. I will not argue with JayB about backup catchers.

  6. #6 by Steven Biel - January 8th, 2010 at 17:51

    Random fill-in-the blank Q–Bryce Harper projects as _______.

  7. #7 by Steven Biel - January 8th, 2010 at 17:51

    I mean position on the field. Catcher? Outfield? What do you think?

  8. #8 by mjames - January 8th, 2010 at 18:34

    I would not be too quick to pass on Maxwell. If given a legitimate chance he will surprise people. I think this guy is good. He has not played enough to form an opinion

  9. #9 by NG - January 8th, 2010 at 19:50

    So, if I understand correctly, this means that Garate cleared waivers (which could’ve been revoked had someone claimed him), is still under team control, and will go into spring training with a chance to win a job and get back on the roster. Seems like the easiest move since he can’t decline the assignment, as I assume someone like Slaten could, and he’s least likely to be claimed, as someone like Atilano might be.

  10. #10 by JayB - January 9th, 2010 at 08:55

    I do not expect them to drop the dead weight before they have some better 40 man people acquired Brain. The point was the improvements to the roster this winter by Rizzo are at best half what is needed and I still see at the very least 5 spots that need upgrading before Rizzo can claim this winter a success.

    The rule 5 issue is small but I do not like trading picks as a strategy. RH Bull Pen guys that are at least as good as Mark B can be picked up without giving up anything. I would say looking over the rule 5 drafts that were made by all other team that any single player picked was better than someone on our current 40 man roster so I do not understand not making any pick at all after Mark B.

    Bottom line for me as a fan is this team needs to show me they are not going to stand pat on a job half done this winter. I expect at least 5 more players to be moved onto the 40 man roster over the next 2 months.

  11. #11 by JayB - January 9th, 2010 at 09:03

    Mark B. trad pick I sould say

  12. #12 by Brian Oliver - January 9th, 2010 at 09:48

    My guess is that the team that drafts him will give him every opportunity to remain at catcher.

    I’d consider him as a shortstop or center fielder if catcher is not in the offing.

  13. #13 by BinM - January 9th, 2010 at 15:08

    Mark B.?

  14. #14 by AndrewStebbins - January 9th, 2010 at 16:08

    Brian, any idea how involved the Nats are in the Chapman bidding? Seems like their biggest competition at this point is the Blue Jays. Anyone know what the character questions marks are and if they might stop Rizzo from going higher than other teams?

  15. #15 by JayB - January 9th, 2010 at 18:02

    Brian Bruney….my mistake….I do not see much of American League…once he pitcher in Nats Park I will know him….Point was his type is not hard to pick up as FA and I think we need to use all the Rule 5 picks we can to find an upgrade to this current 40 man roster. International signing would be great as well, Japanese pitchers have done well in general….got to be better than Estrada.

  16. #16 by AndrewStebbins - January 9th, 2010 at 19:32

    I don’t get the Estrada hate. He did OK this season in Washington. I’d rather have him on the roster and serve as a 7th/8th starter or an extra reliever than Atilano.

  17. #17 by JayB - January 9th, 2010 at 19:43

    It is not just Estrada….it is the 7-10 career AAA guys on the 40 man roster he represents. No other team in baseball would carry more than on or two of them and we have way to many for a team the revenue stream and market potential that the Nats have. Six years into this now….I expect more progress.

  18. #18 by AndrewStebbins - January 9th, 2010 at 20:58

    JayB :

    It is not just Estrada….it is the 7-10 career AAA guys on the 40 man roster he represents. No other team in baseball would carry more than on or two of them and we have way to many for a team the revenue stream and market potential that the Nats have. Six years into this now….I expect more progress.

    Who else fills up 40 man rosters? You need reserves. I can’t find the 7-10 career AAA guys you’re referring to, even if that was an exaggeration I don’t see more than a couple guys I would remove.

  19. #19 by Brian Oliver - January 9th, 2010 at 21:00

    JayB – The issue with wholesale change to the 40-man is that many of the improvements to the “7-10 AAA guys on the 40-man roster” are not out there without their own issues. Many of these improvements are guys who need to be on the 25-man and/or without options remaining. So, if the Nationals were to sign more than a half of a dozen improvements, they are opening themselves to losing many of them when they have to make 25-man decisions.

    I’m not going to argue that there might be some guys with options better than some of the guys on the 40-man. But I don’t believe there are enough to warrant changing over 25% of the 40-man in a given off-season. The Nationals DO need to continue to improve the 40-man and I think they have taken the first steps. It’s not going to be a quick fix unless they make changes in areas outside of the Estradas and Atilanos. The changes need to be made among the Gonzalezes and Guzmans

  20. #20 by JayB - January 9th, 2010 at 22:08

    Interesting point Brian. My thinking was if the 40 man had more talent (players with higher potential then the Gonzoleszes and Guzmans could find themselfs on the bench or traded.

    Not sure I understand why we can not upgrade our 30-40 range. Looking at other teams 40 man rosters you see much more talent in that range. I guess you are saying that the only way you get those guys is through Farm system? Why could you not have improved the 40 man by signing more FA like Marco S. at SS thus getting rid of the need for Gonzolezes and Guzman types? Those type of moves do not take time right?

  21. #21 by Brian Oliver - January 9th, 2010 at 22:24

    To me, the 33-40 range on most 40-man rosters are primarily filled by either (a) the prospects who have to be placed on the 40-man or lost to the Rule 5 or (b) the interchangeable parts that teams require to fill in as extra bullpen arms, spot starters or bench guys.

    They could have improved the 40-man by targeting the 10-20 range on the 40-man (though I’d argue Scutaro wasn’t worth Type A compensation). So if the Nationals want to add a Ben Sheets or Orlando Hudson to the 40-man at the expense of one of the 33-40 range guys, great. I just believe that the F/As left on the market at this point (at least the ones that make sense for the Nats) are not necessarily those type of guys.

    They added Marquis, Pudge, & Capps thus far. I figure they might have one or two moves left at that level this off-season (at max).

    The damage done in not improving the farm system by the previous regime is not going to be repaired that quickly and I’m not sure whether signing guys who are likely the 27-30th best and do not have options and thus could be lost at the end of spring (through waivers) are really where the Nationals should be looking

  22. #22 by JayB - January 9th, 2010 at 22:35

    Marco S would not have cost the Nats a pick due to last in baseball record last year right?

    In any case we can always agree that Jimbo/Stan and mostly Mark L cost this team at least 2 years of development of the Farm. I am not sold that things have improved much in the Farm yet. Until this team commits to international signings we are playing with one hand behind the back.

    As you may recall, I was one who wanted Rizzo to move fast this off season….so the situation you know say we are faced with (nobody left) would not be the case. Yes we are making progress but to my mind when you waste several years you need to move aggressively to make up for that self inflected wound. Signing international FA’s would speed the improvement greatly. Cuban and Japanese pitchers would really help…..Mark Lerner really hurt the team protecting Jimbo.

  23. #23 by Rich - January 10th, 2010 at 00:43

    Bryce Harper as a possible shortstop? Huh. I never would thunk it. That would be cool. I assumed he was too tall.

  24. #24 by JayB - January 10th, 2010 at 09:19

    Question about Winter Ball…Nats have 2 position players with just 100 AB’s and just 1 pitcher with just over 20 IPed. Looking at other teams shows teams like the PIT who have 7 players with well over 100 ABs and 7 pitchers with over 20 IPed.

    Both Nats and Pitt are supposed to be young teams working on developing players from within. Why are the Nats seemingly under utilizing the Winter Ball tool? Not including Dukes who we have already talked about here….Chico, Maxwell, Roger B., Mike Morse and Guzman all (just from the current 40 man roster) needed more playing time in 2009 or have specific issues they could be working on. Reading review of the Farm constantly produce comments like “strikes out to much” or “lacks defensive skills” and “needs to work on plate dicipline”. Guys like Burgess could be in winter ball. Guys like Guzman should be learning 2nd Base. I know Nats can not make a player go but so many other teams seem to be doing it….why not Nats?

  25. #25 by JD - January 10th, 2010 at 10:51

    Signing of Scutaro would have cost the Nats a 2nd round pick. I agree with Bryan, for this team he would not be worth it.

    Probably a moot point anyway in that if a player has the choice of a 90+ win team or the Nats he will pick the 90+ win team.

    The team is smart to be patient, but I do hope another upgrade or two is coming.

  26. #26 by JayB - January 10th, 2010 at 12:04

    Brian,

    I do not see old Smiley (Lugo) anywhere on the big board….even at 23 he has to have some talent right?

    I understand he can not get into the country, but talk about a guy who should be playing winter ball somewhere…..any work on what his status with the Nats is?

    Losing a 2nd Round pick for a proven player…sounds like a good deal to me.

  27. #27 by Brian Oliver - January 10th, 2010 at 12:13

    Carlos Alvarez is listed on the DSL team, where he played in 2009

    He needs to be granted a visa to come and play in the US and I’m not sure he’ll ever get one given the publicity of the fraud committed

  28. #28 by JayB - January 10th, 2010 at 12:46

    Thanks….I understand he will never play MLB but why then have the Nats not cut him loose? If he is still a Nats player then why would he not be playing winter ball given that is the only place he can move up the ranks for the forseeable future?

    I was expecting you to say the complete failure of Nats to develop international (Latin) FA is the difference between Nats and Say Pitt or a host of other teams with much more significant Winter Ball participation. My response to that would be teams like the A’s who have several non-latin players working this winter. Names like Brown, Fox and Carter are all getting tons of AB’s this winter.

  29. #29 by Brian Oliver - January 10th, 2010 at 13:23

    JayB – I appreciate your passion and you are entitled to your opinion.

    But I am really weary of the constant negativity it seems comes whenever I post anything.

    The Nationals have obviously not done enough in your opinion and that’s fine. But it’s becoming more and more difficult for me to keep this going when the negativity pervades.

  30. #30 by JayB - January 10th, 2010 at 13:53

    Fair enough….when you have back to back 100 loses what you see as my negativity I see as a search for possible positive steps they could be taking to improve their own self inflected wounds.

    Sorry I come off negative…..I will give it a rest in deference to you as I greatly respect your views….Honestly as you know I love the Nats and just want them to do all they can to improve as fast as they can….Winter Ball seems like something that would help the farm system and others seem to use it much more.

  31. #31 by Paul - January 10th, 2010 at 14:04

    If this pans out, would you be a little happier JayB?

    “Aroldis Chapman has agreed to a $30MM with an unknown National League team… Washington looks like the favorite, but we’ll have to wait for more details on this one.”

    http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2010/01/aroldis-chapman-agrees-to-30mm-deal.html

  32. #32 by SpringfieldFan - January 11th, 2010 at 10:48

    We’ll all have a lot more to talk about in just over a month. Viera will bring a thaw.

  33. #33 by SpringfieldFan - January 11th, 2010 at 10:50

    And good luck today, Brian!

  34. #34 by catocony - January 11th, 2010 at 20:42

    JayB, it’s no so much your negativity as lack of knowledge of minor league workings and team systems. If you don’t like some of the guys on the 40-man right now, how do you propose to replace them? There are 29 other teams and everyone has basically the same plan when it comes to the 40-man roster. There aren’t gangs of major-league caliber guys out there playing in the indie leagues that you just make a phone call and have them swing by to sign up.

    Most of your posts show that you don’t have a real good grasp of players. “Oh, just cut that guy and sign someone else”"No need to trade someone, just sign someone else”. Do you really think Rizzo is trying to make an easy job hard? it’s not a fantasy league or anything.

    You’re a fan but I get the impression you never played the game and don’t know anyone who really has. Most of my friends are done at this point but I was good friends in college with most of the players who came in and out over the 4 years I was there and met a lot of guys from other schools. Then, guys on their teams in the minors and MLB. At one point, I had 7 pretty good friends in the bigs at the same time and quite a few more guys toiling away from high-A to AAA.

    Does that make me an expert? Far from it, but a lot of your posts are silly to guys like me who have even remote insight into the madness that is professional baseball. For a guy like Brian, it has to be frustrating putting up with the potshots from a guy who quite frankly simply doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

  35. #35 by JayB - January 11th, 2010 at 23:59

    Catocony,

    You could not be further from the truth. It was some time ago but I hit it college against a 300 game winner. I know many guys who made MLB included some I still talk with.

    They will tell you the Nats have mismanaged the roster year after year and that the Nats need to spend money to improve and vastly change their front office…..well good news is they have done both in the past year but to my mind they owe fans like me who put up with their dysfunctional years with more faster…..Signing Chapman would have been just one of hundreds of ways they could have updgraded the 40 man in a hurry. Just because you are willing to wait another 5 years a winning team…I am not.

  36. #36 by JayB - January 12th, 2010 at 00:21

    Cont….you are correct that I do not know much about building a farm system…I never was drafted…I come here to learn what is going on and try to find ideas on how Nats could improve faster. Problem is that so many people here are perfectly happy with a joke of MLB team. They seem to think that the goal is to win MILB games…..incremental improvement and backslides must be the only way forward. I think you could sign Japaneses pitchers, Cuban pitchers, FA and build the farm system all at the same time…..I do not see any barrier except will of ownership that keeps Rizzo from turning the team into a winner this year. Look at SEA 100 loses to contender in one year. Lots of bad trades but by constant pressure to improve they are now winning and building….it can be done.

  37. #37 by JayB - January 12th, 2010 at 00:28

    cont….last thought, I understand the game of baseball and I know what a solid team looks like and when Milledge types are given jobs based on tools rather than baseball skills. BIG DIFFERENCE. Anyway while I may not know farm development or roster rules….I know good baseball and good baseball talent with instincts for the game. Nats have put just about the worst baseball on the field for 4 straight years. The type of poor fundamentals Acta produced out of camp last year was just unbelievable. That I know and when I saw better baseball in the middle of the summer I knew that too. I like what Rizzo has done….I just know he can do a lot more a lot faster given the resources this team has in the bank.

  38. #38 by catocony - January 12th, 2010 at 00:49

    So again, you know zero about how major league systems are built and run. You position seems to be “I know good players and have determined that the Nats have players who aren’t good. They need to be cut and good players signed”. Is that your position? Can you get that typed up and emailed over to Rizzo because I had never thought of it and I bet no one else has either.

    The Nats should not have traded for Bruney, who was a solid reliever on the World Series champ. Better to “use the pick” as you put it to sign some high-A reliever and keep him in the bigs all year because he’s better than Bruney. Awesome, I’m sure Rizzo will feel pretty stupid when you relay that opinion to him.

    As far as “hit against a 300 game winner” what exactly does that mean? Did you play for a Div A college team or did you just take a few swings one afternoon in practice when you were visiting friends on the team? Forget it, it’s not important, but I’ve noticed your posts on this board are usually of the “WTF” type and always negative.

    But you did answer the question when you say you “may not know farm development or roster rules”. That’s very apparent.

  39. #39 by JayB - January 12th, 2010 at 06:36

    Nice talking with you Catocony, so pleasant a tone…played Div iA baseball. Hit against Texas in the early 80’s….you can look up who they had was playing in the old SWC ar the time.

    Brueny type could have been gotten on FA market….he is not that good. International signings from Latin America and Japan are the fastest way to improve the 40….takes cash….your right Rizzo knows this…..he just did not do it…..could have been done but was not done…that does not mean I am wrong.

  40. #40 by catocony - January 12th, 2010 at 10:11

    Ok, so cut Bruney because the guys who have been cut and non-tendered by other teams are better than a member of the world champions. And, to improve the 40 man, you advise signing up all the Dominicans, Venezualens, Koreans and Japanese as possible. Awesome plan. which Japanese and Korean players are going to sign a AAA contract to come play in the International League for us? Which unsigned Latin American players are awaiting a spot in the Nats rotation or to start at 2nd base? I realize that no one has ever scouted or signed players from these areas so major league-ready pitchers and fielders are just sitting around the dugout somewhere waiting on a contract.

    I think you’ve watched way, way too many baseball movies to think that all you need to do is turn down a side street and before you is Sidd Finch or Roy Hobbs, just waiting for the magic moment to arrive….

  41. #41 by JayB - January 12th, 2010 at 11:56

    Oh I think there was a Cuban 22 year old pitcher who is MLB ready signed yesterday…..Balt and Atl signed Japanese pitcher who did well for MLB team last year…..my job is not to scout the players so your asking the wrong person….My point is other teams are finding them and making it happen…that Nats are not.

  42. #42 by catocony - January 12th, 2010 at 14:32

    Yeah, the Orioles signed a Japanese starter last year who lasted about a third of a season and will be a very expensive long reliever this year. And regarding Chapman, the operative phrase you used is “I think”. The Nats apparently finished second in that bidding, i think they went well and beyond reasonable to do so. The Reds are taking a massive risk there, it may very well pay off. Then again, a guy with little documented history may end up going nowhere. Or he may end up being 28 and not 22. Or who knows what.

  43. #43 by JayB - January 12th, 2010 at 16:01

    All your view of risk and “failure” pale in the face of Nats history. Any of those guys would be better than 2009 pitching staf. Nats spent and equal amount of money on D Young, and Kearns over a much small time frame…which would you think smarter….International FA pitching of Kearns and Young?

    With respect to Chapman….Being second in the bidding means only that you lost…..No player is a sure thing but by RIzzo’s own words Chapman is as close as it gets and the team would be much different today if they had made sure they were the top bidder. Enough with the excuses, other teams are making moves in these area’s improving their rosters and winning games. That is all I am asking the Nats do……Is SEA that much bigger a market?

  44. #44 by JayB - January 12th, 2010 at 16:05

    IFA or Kearns and Young

  45. #45 by JayB - January 12th, 2010 at 16:30

    Check out ATL and Kenshin Kawakami’s numbers last year…….I’ll take that “risk” as you call it.

  46. #46 by Berndaddy - January 12th, 2010 at 16:57

    JayB your act is getting old. Patience is a virtue my friend. I’m all in for the Nats. 1yr/2yrs/5 or 10yrs… I’ll go back to lurking…

  47. #47 by JayB - January 12th, 2010 at 16:59

    As am I….just want to see a better quality of Baseball this year. Looking at the roster, I do not see it yet…….Hope I am wrong.

  48. #48 by Jeff E. - January 12th, 2010 at 18:49

    Cal Ripken…Hubie Brooks for a spell….tall shortstops or tall women..whats wrong with the paradigm??? LOL!!

(will not be published)
  1. No trackbacks yet.