Across the Affiliates 09/02/09


Syracuse

  • Lost 11-4 to Scranton/Wilkes-Barre (box/gamer). RHP Collin Balester gave up three runs on seven hits and two walks over 4IP, striking out five & taking the loss. The Chiefs bullpen was wild as RHPs Zech Zinicola & Clint Everts and LHPs Yunior Novoa & Jack Spradlin walked a combined nine over five innings of relief, surrendering eight runs on seven hits. CA Jhonathan Solaon was 2/4 with a double & run scored; 1B Kory Casto was 2/4 with one RBI; CF Mike Daniel was 1/4 with one RBI; SS Ian Desmond was 1/3 with a stolen base & run scored; and LF Leonard Davis was 0/5 with one RBI.
  • Syracuse has seven games to play
  • Today – Syracuse RHP Shairon Martis (3-4, 5.43) at Lehigh Valley LHP Brian Mazone (1-5, 4.14) 7:05PM

Division

Club  PCT  GB 
Scranton/WB 76 58 0.567 -
Syracuse 73 64 0.533 4.5
Rochester 68 69 0.496 9.5
Lehigh Valley 66 71 0.482 11.5
Pawtucket 57 79 0.419 20.0
Buffalo 54 82 0.397 23.0 

Wild Card

Club  PCT  GB 
Durham 78 60 0.565 -
Gwinnett 78 60 0.565 -
Syracuse 73 64 0.533 4.5
Indianapolis 69 68 0.504 8.5
Toledo 69 68 0.504 8.5
Norfolk 68 68 0.500 9.0
Rochester 68 69 0.496 9.5
Charlotte 66 71 0.482 11.5
Lehigh Valley 66 71 0.482 11.5
Pawtucket 57 79 0.419 20.0
Columbus 55 81 0.404 22.0
Buffalo 54 82 0.397 23.0 

Harrisburg

  • Defeated Erie 8-7 (box/gamer). RHP Jeff Mandel surrendered seven runs (six earned) on eleven hits over 6IP with three strikeouts. RHP Adrian Alaniz & LHP Atahualpa Severino pitched the final three scoreless innings, striking out a combined seven with Severino earning his sixth win of the season. LF Bill Rhinehart was 2/3 with two doubles, two runs & two RBI; CA Sean Rooney was 2/4 with two doubles, two runs & two RBI; RF Marvin Lowrance was 3/4 with two runs; 2B Jemel Spearman was 2/4 with a double & three RBI; and 1B Chris Marrero was 0/4.
  • The win brings Harrisburg to 0.500 for the first time since the second game of the season.
  • Today – Erie (TBA x2) at Harrisburg RHP Brad Meyers (4-0, 2.19) & LHP Justin Jones (4-12, 4.71) 6PM

Division

Club  PCT  GB 
Akron 83 53 0.610 -
Reading 71 64 0.526 11.5
Erie 69 65 0.515 13.0
Bowie 69 66 0.511 13.5
Harrisburg 67 67 0.500 15.0
Altoona 60 76 0.441 23.0 

Potomac

  • Defeated Lynchburg 4-3 in 11 innings (box/gamer). RHP Brad Peacock allowed three runs on three hits and three walks over 6IP with one strikeout. RHP Luis Garcia made his P-Nats debut, striking out two in one inning of work; RHP Dan Leatherman struck out three over two scoreless innings and RHP Hassan Pena picked up the win scattering three hits and a walk over 2IP while striking out three. SS Danny Espinosa was 1/5; LF Jesus Valdez was 2/5 with a run scored; RF Michael Burgess was 1/5 with a double & run scored; DH Brian Peacock was 2/4 with two doubles & one RBI; 3B Stephen King was 1/4 with one RBI; and CF Boomer Whiting was 0/4 with the game-winning sacrifice fly.
  • Notes – Potomac News feature on Espinosa
  • Potomac has six games remaining
  • Today – Lynchburg (TBA) at Potomac LHP Will Atwood (8-7, 4.44) 7:05PM

Division

Club  PCT  GB 
Wilmington 42 23 0.646 -
Potomac 39 25 0.609 2.5
Frederick 31 33 0.484 10.5
Lynchburg 25 39 0.391 16.5 

Hagerstown

  • Lost 3-2 to Lakewood (box/gamer). RHP A.J. Morris gave up two runs on four hits over 5IP with four strikeouts. 2B Stephen Lombardozzi was 1/4; CA Derek Norris was 2/4; 1B Tyler Moore was 1/3; RF J.R. Higley was 0/4 with a run scored; DH Travis Reagan was 2/3 with two doubles & two RBI; and 3B/SS Steven Souza was 0/2 with two walks, a stolen base & run scored.
  • Today – Hagerstown RHP Paul Demny (3-10, 4.89) at Lakewood (TBA) 7:05PM

Division

Club  PCT  GB 
Kannapolis 41 22 0.651 -
West Virginia 37 24 0.607 3.0
Lake County 36 28 0.563 5.5
Lakewood 32 30 0.516 8.5
Delmarva 29 32 0.475 11.0
Hickory 28 36 0.438 13.5
Greensboro 26 38 0.406 15.5
Hagerstown 22 39 0.361 18.0 

Vermont

  • Lost 5-1 to Staten Island (box/gamer). RHP Kyle Morrison allowed three runs (one earned) on five hits and one walk over 4IP with two strikeouts, taking the loss. LF J.P. Ramirez was 1/3; CA Sandy Leon was 1/4 with a run scored; 3B Jack Walker was 1/2 with a walk; and CF Jay Sferra was 1/3 with one RBI.
  • Today – Tri-City (TBA) at Vermont LHPs Mitchell Clegg (1-4, 2.21) & Chad Jenkins (0-1, 6.15) 6:05PM

Division

Club  PCT  GB 
Lowell 40 29 0.580 -
Oneonta 34 34 0.500 5.5
Vermont 31 38 0.449 9.0
Tri-City 23 46 0.333 17.0 

GCL Nationals

  • Defeated GCL Twins 1-0 in 12 innings to move into GCL Championship (box/gamer).
  • Today – GCL Nationals at GCL Marlins 12PM [LHP Josh Smoker (4-2, 3.38) would be on his regular turn]
  • Tomorrow – GCL Marlins at GCL Nationals 12PM [RHP Taylor Jordan (2-0, 3.63) would be on his regular turn]
  • Friday (if necessary) – GCL Nationals at GCL Marlins 12PM [LHP Graham Hicks (3-0, 3.60) would be on his regular turn]

Tragic Number Update

MLB W L GA Left Tragic
Washington 46 87 0.0 29 -
Kansas City 51 81 5.5 30 24
Pittsburgh 53 78 8.0 31 22
Baltimore 54 79 8.0 29 21
San Diego 58 76 11.5 28 17
Oakland 58 74 12.5 30 17
Cleveland 58 73 13.0 31 17
NY Mets 59 73 13.5 30 16
Cincinnati 59 73 13.5 30 16
Toronto 59 72 14.0 31 16
Arizona 60 73 14.0 29 15
Houston 63 69 17.5 30 12
Chicago Sox 64 69 18.0 29 11
Milwaukee 64 67 19.0 31 11
Chicago Cubs 66 64 21.5 32 9
Minnesota 67 65 21.5 30 8
Florida 68 64 22.5 30 7
Seattle 69 64 23.0 29 6
Atlanta 70 62 24.5 30 5
Detroit 70 61 25.0 31 5
Tampa Bay 71 60 26.0 31 4
San Francisco 72 60 26.5 30 3
Colorado 73 59 27.5 30 2
Texas 74 58 28.5 30 1

Eliminated: Yankees, Dodgers, Angels, Cardinals, Red Sox, & Phillies

  1. #1 by Positively Half St. - September 2nd, 2009 at 08:59

    Did Luis Garcia get a promotion from low to hi-A with his assignment to Potomac?

  2. #2 by cjrugger - September 2nd, 2009 at 08:59

    That’s a strong rotation for the GCL, there’s no radio for those games is there?

    Brad Peacock is putting together a nice year also, still only 21

  3. #3 by russ - September 2nd, 2009 at 09:02

    Hard to believe that the Senators may have the best chance at the post season. Syr is 4.5 back and Potomac is 2.5 back. The Sens are 3.5 back but are finishing really strong. It will be amazing if they make the playoffs. Good luck to all of the teams for a strong finish!

  4. #4 by Rocket Surgeon - September 2nd, 2009 at 10:01

    The SYR finish is disappointing as they were in great position just a week ago. The bullpen, which had been so good, has really faltered in the stretch and their hitting with RISP (3 for 20 last night) has been awful. LD, who I thought would give them a boost, is hitting .136. 0-5 last night, 3 K’s. They need a miracle to get in.

    I’m trying to figure out why Tim Foli is batting Desmond 8th when he’s hitting .346. I’m sure there is a strategy there, I just need some of you experts to help me figure it out.

  5. #5 by Pilchard - September 2nd, 2009 at 10:05

    The Nats recent 3-12 run has made it seem much more likely that they will finish with the MLB’s worst record for the 2nd year in a row. Kind of think that the Nats would like to avoid another signing countdown against Boras with pressure to again break the all-time bonus record involving another phenom, but it appears that the Bryce Harper watch will begin in a month.

  6. #6 by Rocket Surgeon - September 2nd, 2009 at 10:14

    I would vote that the Nats avoid all the hype and the amount of time it’s going to take Harper to get to the majors and take a player who’s going to have more of an immediate impact. They need help a lot sooner than later. Look for the best college hitter available.

  7. #7 by cjrugger - September 2nd, 2009 at 10:36

    Rocket Surgeon- That thinking landed us Ross Detwiler (a maybe #3 starter) instead of Jason Heyward (the best player in the minor leagues, who could be starting in RF for us next year)

  8. #8 by Sue Dinem - September 2nd, 2009 at 11:08

    Syracuse’s magic number to tie for the wild card is eleven with seven to play, to win it’s 12. They play sub-.500 teams the rest of the way, with four on the road and three at home (the last three). Their home/away splits are basically even.

    Potomac’s magic number to tie is eight with six to play, to win it’s nine. All six games are at home against sub-.500 teams in the 2nd half. In the 2nd half, the PNats are 8 games over .500 at home but all year long, they’ve been a much better road team (44-27 vs. 32-28). If the two teams tie, Potomac will get the home game, as the Nationals will have a better overall percentage. It’s hard to say who that will favor as the Blue Rocks have also been outstanding on the road (44-26 vs. 36-28).

    The Senators’ magic number to tie is eleven with eight to play, to win it’s 12. They play +.500 teams the rest of the way with three at home (vs. Erie), five on the road (all at Bowie). They have been slightly worse on the road vs. home (36-31 vs. 31-36). They are 4-9 vs. the Baysox.

    None of these teams will play the current wild-card leader.

    I’d have to argue that Syracuse has the best chance of the three Nats franchises, since they’re playing losing teams the rest of the way and have played as well on the road as at home.

    Harrisburg does have to leapfrog three teams, and while they play two of them, one of those teams plays all its games at home (Bowie), and the Baysox play last-place Binghamton for the next two. If Erie manages to beat back the Senators over the next three, its “reward” is to play Akron on the road for the last four. And finally, current wild-card leader Reading finishes the string current second-place New Britain, and then first-place Connecticut — all on the road.

    If Reading remains ahead when it comes to play Connecticut, it should be in good position because (a) Connecticut will be in cruise-control mode (b) the crowds will be sparse due to the holiday weekend, and the lame-duck status of the franchise (another story entirely, but chances are good that another affiliated team will relocate there for next season).

    Potomac’s probably last because the team they’re chasing, Wilmington, is playing the league’s doormat (Myrtle Beach) the next two games, then also-ran Frederick, all at home. Realistically, the Blue Rocks only need to win three of the next five games, while Potomac has to be near-perfect (five or six out of six).

  9. #9 by Pilchard - September 2nd, 2009 at 11:16

    The Nats philosphy has got to be to take the best player available with their first pick. If the front office determines that the best player is a college hitter, fine. However, would be a huge mistake to bypass a better prospect simply because “they need an immediate impact”. Disasterous baseball draft philosophy to look for “immediate impact” players.

  10. #10 by joNAThan - September 2nd, 2009 at 11:16

    Always take the best player available. Period.

  11. #11 by NG - September 2nd, 2009 at 11:30

    Fun game in Potomac last night;

    Very impressive debut for Luis Garcia. Couldn’t see the radar gun, but fastball looked hard and he overwhelmed two hitters with a very good breaking ball, and got a third to hit a weak grounder to short.

    Peacock struggled to get into a rhythm after the early errors and walks; got lucky on a few balls hit very hard but right at outfielders. But he did a good job keeping the team in it and letting the offense come around.

  12. #12 by RT - September 2nd, 2009 at 11:59

    Here is a question, assuming the Nats end up with the worst record. Which of these scenarios would you like the Nats to follow:

    Scenario 1 – The Nats draft Bryce Harper who is considered the best talent in the draft. He is also a Boris client who will demand a contract probably close to Strasburg. Because Harper will demand such a large signing bonus, the Nats will therefore draft very conservatively over the next 5-6 rounds. Looking for signability as much as talent. This by many reports is exactly what they did during this years draft. There were more talented players available when they made the selections of players like Kobernus, Holder, Morris, etc. but because so much time and money was locked up in Strasburg they needed to draft players they knew they could sign at slot or under slot.

    Or Scenario 2 – The Nats pass on Harper and the $12 million or so it would take to sign him and instead sign the best available college player (maybe even another High school player) for considerably less money than Harper. For arguments sake, lets say they sign the best available college player for $8 million. They then use that $4 million of savings and draft more aggressively over the first 7-8 rounds. Draft the more talented players who are slipping because of signability concerns and are willing to go over MLB recommended slot in order to get these players signed.

    In the end they will end up spending roughly the same amount of money. In Scenario one I could see them ending up with the most talented player in the draft, but possibly only end up with 1-2 players that have top 100 talent in the draft. Scenario two, you pass on the most talented player but possibly end up signing 4-5 players who have top 100 talent. I personally would prefer scenario 2! What do you guys think

  13. #13 by Brian Oliver - September 2nd, 2009 at 12:04

    RT – I think they should draft/sign Harper and do what you suggested in scenario #2.

    The Nationals were too conservative in the middle of the draft this year. I understand Strasburg was going to be expensive but they need to take advantage of sliding players when they can. The idea that they needed to “save” $600-800K in the 5th or 6th rounds was shortsighted. Instead of taking the slot guy at $200K there, why not grab an $800K guy who slid? That “extra” $600K would likely pay dividends in the future.

    I’m not suggesting they spend $1M+ on every pick after the 1st rounder but exploiting the holes in the draft is something they should consider.

    To answer your question, draft/sign Harper if you have the 1/1

  14. #14 by RT - September 2nd, 2009 at 12:21

    Brian, I totally agree with you that this is totally what they should do. Problem is that I dont have any faith that this what they WILL do. Until ownership/front office proves me wrong, I think these decisions will continue to be an either/or situation.

  15. #15 by estuartj - September 2nd, 2009 at 12:32

    Assuming tha 1) The Nats finish last and 2) Harper is the hitter we are led to believe then; is he a catcher or another position player? IE if he is within a year or so of being mlb ready as a hitter, do you wait to develop his catching skills or do you move him to a quicker developing defensive position (RF, 2B, 1B)?

  16. #16 by cjrugger - September 2nd, 2009 at 12:54

    estuartj- Where do you see he is 1 year away from being a mlb hitter? I assumed he’d spend at least 2 to 3 years in the minors

  17. #17 by cjrugger - September 2nd, 2009 at 13:06

    Josh Smoker is walking the tightrope: 4IP, 6H, 1R, a WP, balk and 1K

  18. #18 by peric - September 2nd, 2009 at 13:16

    What’s up with Luis Atilano? A rotation of Estrada, Atilano, Detwiler and Thompson could pretty much take AAA Syracuse to the playoffs and beyond. Have to figure they are bound for a major league audition at some point soon?

  19. #19 by Pilchard - September 2nd, 2009 at 13:16

    Could be wrong, but I think that by going with signability over projectability in the middle rounds of the 2009 draft, the Nats were trying to curry favor with MLB (by following the slotting system) because they knew that they were going way over slot to sign SS.

    Not sure if it’s due to the hope of landing the All-Star game in the near future or if it’s because the Lerners feel indebted to Selig for selecting them when they were bidding for the franchise, but I think that there were ulterior motives for the Nats playing it safe for the 2009 draft after SS.

    I really want to believe that something else was at work rather than being cheap because signing a player to a $200k bonus that never contributes at the MLB level is just throwing away $200k. Whereas, signing a guy for $800k that will become a MLB player and stay under team control for close to a decade is an incredible bargain.

    Got to believe that the Nats front office is smart enough to know that.

  20. #20 by rukidding - September 2nd, 2009 at 13:35

    Brian when is Tom Milone’s next start. I would like to see what all the talk is about. Numbers look great. Could you see him in Harrisburg at the start of next season?

  21. #21 by Brian Oliver - September 2nd, 2009 at 13:38

    ruk – Milone should go on Saturday 9/5 if the rotation holds form

    and I would certainly expect a start in worse than Harrisburg in 2010

  22. #22 by Brian Oliver - September 2nd, 2009 at 13:40

    Pilchard – I always believe that ASG threat is ridiculous for teams to worry enough about to make organizational decisions based upon it.

    While one ASG might bring folks here, trips to the playoffs and WS bring them and for more games. The only way for the Nats to get there is to improve and they can do that by improving their farm system.

  23. #23 by estuartj - September 2nd, 2009 at 13:52

    cjrugger, so much of the hype i’ve seen has centered on his having already developed his power stroke (unusual for a HS kid) and his batters eye (almost unheard of); I’m sure Boras is going to be pusing him as the next A-Rod, and if you going to sign him to a deal similar to that a top college hitter gets (which I even think is fair) then are you gong to wait for his defensive skills as a catcher are refined to MLB quality, or do you switch him to another position to speed his route to the bigs.

    BTW if I had to be I say the Nats take him (and sign him), convert him to a 1B/OF and have him in the bigs by September of 2011 – but then again I never bet.

  24. #24 by RT - September 2nd, 2009 at 14:10

    CJrugger

    All depends on how quickly he develops. He is by no means flawless. If you watch videos of him one thing that people have noticed is that he has begun to lunge at the ball over the last year or so. I read an article somewhere talking about this. One thought is that with all the pressure and hype now surrounding him that he feels he needs to “justify” it by hitting these monster 500 foot homeruns everywhere he goes. He is trying to so hard to generate as much bat speed as he can to hit these monster homeruns that he is actually developing some bad habits. I was a Division I pitcher and the first thing I thought when I saw him swing was that if you made a mistake he would absolutely embarrass you, but he was so off balance that unless you made a mistake he probably wouldnt be all that difficult of an out if you changed speeds on him.

    Obviously this is the first thing they are going to try and correct and there is no doubt that this kid will be a stud, but he is in no way flawless. Whether or not he is ready by 19 or whether he needs a few more years will depend on how long it takes him to break some of these bad habits he has picked up. When he does though, watch out!

  25. #25 by RT - September 2nd, 2009 at 14:11

    sorry that was meant for estuartj, not CJrugger

  26. #26 by Brian Oliver - September 2nd, 2009 at 14:16

    GCL Nats take 3-1 lead into top of 9th

  27. #27 by cjrugger - September 2nd, 2009 at 14:26

    estuartj- I’ll bet, A LOT, that he is not major league ready in Sep’11. He will still be 18 at that time, and have about 5 months of minor league experience. If he is ready by Spring ‘13 he’d be miles ahead of the game

  28. #28 by Sec 204 Row H Seat 7 - September 2nd, 2009 at 14:42

    GCL Nationals beat the GCL Marlins 3-1. Only one more to go!

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Comments are closed.